4.7 Article

A sulfur-limestone bioretention system for stormwater treatment: Nitrogen removal performance and microbial community

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 827, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154301

关键词

Sulfur-limestone bioretention system; Sulfur autotrophic denitrification; Microbial community

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2017ZX07106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lab-scale sulfur-limestone based bioretention system with a submerged zone was used to remove nitrate-nitrogen from stormwater. The study found that denitrification mainly occurred during the first 5 days of drying period. The system effectively removed nitrate-nitrogen and met the Chinese Quality Standard for Ground Water when the influent concentration was below 30 mg/L. The sulfur autotrophic denitrification process followed a first-order kinetic model, and the dominant bacteria in the submerged zone were Thiobacillus and Halothiobacillus.
A lab-scale sulfur-limestone based bioretention system with a submerged zone was used to remove nitrate-nitrogen (NO3--N) from stormwater. The results indicated that denitrification mainly occurred during the first 5 d of drying period. With the NO3--N concentration in the influent increasing from 20 to 50 mg/L, after 5 d of drying period 93.99-97.26% NO3--N was removed, and the effluent sulfate (SO42-) concentration ranged from 170.28 to 359.87 mg/L. When the NO3--N content in the influent was lower than 30 mg/L, the effluent SO42- concentration met the Chinese Quality Standard for Ground Water (GB/T 14848-2017). Compared with the woodchips bioretention, there was no organic matter leakage problem. Sulfur autotrophic denitrification process followed first-order kinetic model, and the reaction kinetic parameters (k) were 0.7392-1.1472 d(-1). The dominant genera in the submerged zone were Thiobacillus and Halothiobacillus (> 63.69%) which participated in the sulfur autotrophic denitrification process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据