4.5 Article

Improving Preservice Primary Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Methods of Science Through Reflective Reading of News Articles

期刊

SCIENCE & EDUCATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-022-00338-y

关键词

Media; Methods of science; Nature of science; Reading; Teacher education; The scientific method

资金

  1. CRUE-CSIC agreement
  2. Springer Nature
  3. MCIN/AEI (Government of Spain) [EDU2017-82505-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the efficacy of a reading activity on improving the understanding of science methods for preservice primary teachers. The activity involved reading opinion articles, reflecting and discussing in small groups, and sharing responses in class. The results showed an improvement in the teachers' understanding of various aspects of science methods.
A study is presented that analyzed the pedagogical efficacy of reading opinion articles about methods of science, published in the media, in order to improve the meta-scientific understanding of 52 preservice primary teachers (PPTs) with regard to the topic. To this end, an activity was designed taking an explicit and reflective approach. The design of the activity required a short teaching intervention when being implemented in class in order to facilitate its integration into the program of the subject of science teaching. Before doing the activity, the PPTs' prior conceptions about the nature of methods of science were diagnosed using the Opinions about Science, Technology and Society Questionnaire (COCTS, in its Spanish acronym). The activity consisted of reading the articles, and then responding in small work groups to a series of questions for reflection and debate on the topic. The groups' responses were then shared and discussed in class. Once the activity had finished, the PPTs responded to the questionnaire again (post-test) in order to evaluate how their conceptions had progressed. There was an improvement in their understanding of various aspects of the nature of methods of science (e.g., scientists use a variety of methods in their research depending on the object of study, the context, and the resources available, or that the scientific method is an idealized, simplistic, and therefore poor representation of how scientists do research). These results show that the activity was effective in getting the PPTs to reflect and learn about the topic. Finally, the limitations of the study are discussed (e.g., the limited time frame to implement the activity and evaluate results), and some future research perspectives are given to improve the understanding of PPTs about the nature of methods of science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据