4.2 Article

Tree-level differences in Norway spruce and Scots pine growth after extreme thinning treatments

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 109-118

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2022.2045348

关键词

intensive thinning; low thinning; crown thinning; Fennoscandia

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated tree-level dynamics in spruce- and pine-dominated stands after intermediate commercial thinning of different type and intensity. The results showed that extreme thinning increased individual tree basal area growth and decreased stem slenderness for both species. There were only small differences across thinning types, suggesting that crown thinning is a viable alternative to the widely-used low thinning in Fennoscandia.
We studied tree-level dynamics (stem slenderness and growth) in spruce- and pine-dominated stands after intermediate commercial thinning of different type (low, crown normal, and crown strict) and intensity (standard and extreme), for two 5-years growth periods. Thinning treatments were included in modeling as numerical variables based on how they changed the stand- and tree-level conditions (in terms of mean diameter of remaining trees and basal area of larger trees removed). Stem slenderness significantly decreased with time for both species and all types only in the extreme intensity (excluding low thinning for pine). Regarding basal area growth, for both species it was slightly higher in low than crown thinning, and much higher in extreme intensity for all thinning types. Pine had a lower basal area growth in the second period after thinning compared with the first one. Height growth differences were not found across treatments. Concluding, extreme thinning increased individual tree basal area growth and decreased stem slenderness for both species compared with thinning carried out according to the standard guidelines. Across types, there were only small differences, hence crown thinning seems a viable option to the widely used low thinning in Fennoscandia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据