4.0 Article

Initial Stages of The Ignition of Coal Microparticles of Different Grades by Laser Pulses

期刊

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 227-235

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S1990793122020026

关键词

coal; emission spectra; laser; ignition; ignition thresholds; ignition stages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the emission spectra and chemical reactions of coal particles under laser pulse irradiation are related to the metamorphism rank of coal, with changes in energy density significantly affecting the chemical reaction rates and combustion processes in coal particles.
The emission spectra of coal particles <= 63 mu m in the the metamorphism rank from long-flame to anthracite are studied during exposure to a laser pulse (tau(i) = 120 mu s). The threshold value of the laser pulse density, H-cr((1)), at which it becomes possible to detect the emission of coal particles by instruments, is related to the ignition of reactive microprotrusions on the surface of the coal particles. At an energy density of H = H-cr((2)), the surface of the coal particles is sufficiently heated to initiate chemical reactions in their volume, as well as the release and ignition of volatile matter, through a heterogeneous ignition mechanism. As the energy density increases to H > H-cr((3)) the chemical processes in the coal particles are similar to the processes occurring during H= H-cr((2)), but with the increase in H, the intensity of the emission and, consequently, the rate of chemical reactions in the coal particles increase during the action of the laser pulse. In the spectra at all stages of ignition, the emission of CO2* (CO flame), excited molecules of H-2* and H2O*, and incandescent particles of coal (or tar) were detected, which is typical for all the studied coal marks. The spectrum-integrated brightness of the emission of coal particles during the exposure to a laser pulse increases almost linearly in the the metamorphism rank.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据