4.1 Article

Increasing the Electrochemical Activity of the Pr1.95La0.05CuO4 Cathode by Laser Modification of the Electrode/Electrolyte Interface Profiler

期刊

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 93-99

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1023193522020070

关键词

praseodymium cuprate; laser processing; electrode/electrolyte interface; impedance spectroscopy; solid oxide fuel cell

资金

  1. RFBR [20-08-00454]
  2. Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences [0089-2019-0007, AAAA-A19-119061890019-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the surface topology of the Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 solid electrolyte, formed by laser processing, on the electrochemical activity of the Pr1.95La0.05CuO4 cathode material in oxygen reduction reaction is studied. The ordered columnar structure with a relief profile depth of approximately 11-12 μm is found to be the most preferable for achieving higher electrochemical activity.
The influence of the Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 solid electrolyte surface topology formed by laser processing on the electrochemical activity of the Pr1.95La0.05CuO4 cathode material in oxygen reduction reaction is studied. The ordered columnar structure of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 with a depth of the relief profile of similar to 11-12 mu m is shown to be the most preferable with respect to the achieving of higher electrochemical activity. A twofold decrease in the polarization resistance of the Pr1.95La0.05CuO4 cathode material from 0.87 Omega cm(2) (the initial sample) to 0.40 Omega cm(2) (the modified Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 surface) at a temperature of 700 degrees C in air was observed upon the transition from the Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 solid electrolyte initial surface to the modified one. Based on the data obtained, the application of the laser processing for the formation of a preset topology of the electrode/electrolyte interface can be considered as an effective technological approach that allows increasing the electrochemical performance of solid oxide fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据