4.7 Article

Assessment of Engineering Properties of Limy Rocks Using Friction-Transfer Test: A Case Study

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 4637-4655

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-022-02881-0

关键词

Friction transfer; Torsion angle; Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS); Qom formation; Conversion factor

资金

  1. president research office of Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran [4.95]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Friction-transfer test can estimate the engineering properties of rocks, such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS). The study found that there is a strong correlation between porosity and friction-transfer value and torsion angle. The relatively high coefficients of determination indicate that friction transfer can successfully predict the UCS of rocks.
Some expensive and challenging laboratory or field tests must be done to obtain the engineering properties of rocks. For avoiding time and cost consumption, some researchers have used simple tests to estimate some engineering properties. The friction-transfer test is partially destructive and can estimate the rock uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) using experimental equations or a previously prepared calibration graph. In this study, some engineering properties of seven types of limy rocks from Qom formation, collected from Hamadan province, were estimated using friction-transfer test results. Regression analysis between friction-transfer and physical properties tests show that the best relationship is between porosity (n%) and friction-transfer value (T) and torsion angle (theta) (R-2 = 0.74). Friction-transfer engineering property regression analysis shows that the best relation is obtained between Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and T, theta, because of the higher R-2 (0.80). Relatively high coefficients of the determination indicate that the friction transfer can successfully predict the UCS of rocks. A conversion factor equal to 0.48 was obtained for estimating UCS by T values for this study data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据