4.5 Article

Effect of alterations in blood volume with bed rest on glucose tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 1098-1105

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00624.2016

关键词

impaired glucose tolerance; dilution space; plasma volume; oral glucose tolerance test; insulin resistance

资金

  1. Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bed rest leads to rapid impairments in glucose tolerance. Plasma volume and thus dilution space for glucose are also reduced with bed rest, but the potential influence on glucose tolerance has not been investigated. Accordingly, the aim was to investigate whether bed rest-induced impairments in glucose tolerance are related to a concomitant reduction in plasma volume. This hypothesis was tested mechanistically by restoring plasma volume with albumin infusion after bed rest and parallel determination of glucose tolerance. Fifteen healthy volunteers (age 24 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 23 +/- 2 kg/m(2), maximal oxygen uptake 44 +/- 8 ml.min(-1).kg(-1); means +/- SD) completed 4 days of strict bed rest. Glucose tolerance [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)] and plasma and blood volumes (carbon monoxide rebreathing) were assessed before and after 3 days of bed rest. On the fourth day of bed rest, plasma volume was restored by means of an albumin infusion prior to an OGTT. Plasma volume was reduced by 9.9 +/- 3.0% on bed rest day 3 and area under the curve for OGTT was augmented by 55 +/- 67%. However, no association (R-2 = 0.09, P = 0.33) between these simultaneously occurring responses was found. While normalization of plasma volume by matched albumin administration (408 +/- 104 ml) transiently decreased (P < 0.05) resting plasma glucose concentration (5.0 +/- 0.4 to 4.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l), this did not restore glucose tolerance. Bed rest-induced alterations in dilution space may influence resting glucose values but do not affect area under the curve for OGTT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据