4.4 Review

Restrictive cardiomyopathy: from genetics and clinical overview to animal modeling

期刊

REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2303108

关键词

cardiomyopathy; restrictive cardiomyopathy; restrictive physiology; mutation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL53392, R01HL116906, R01HL151438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is a rare but potentially devastating heart muscle disorder characterized by abnormal muscle relaxation, restricted ventricular filling, and often accompanied by diastolic dysfunction and atrial enlargement. Approximately 30% of cases are familial and the pathogenesis involves various genetic mutations and other diseases.
Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), a potentially devastating heart muscle disorder, is characterized by diastolic dysfunction due to abnormal muscle relaxation and myocardial stiffness resulting in restrictive filling of the ventricles. Diastolic dysfunction is often accompanied by left atrial or bi-atrial enlargement and normal ventricular size and systolic function. RCM is the rarest form of cardiomyopathy, accounting for 2-5% of pediatric cardiomyopathy cases, however, survival rates have been reported to be 82%, 80%, and 68% at 1-, 2-, and 5-years after diagnosis, respectively. RCM can be idiopathic, familial, or secondary to a systemic disorder, such as amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hereditary hemochromatosis. Approximately 30% of cases are familial RCM, and the genes that have been linked to RCM are cTnT, cTnI, MyBP-C, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, DES, MYPN, TTN, BAG3, DCBLD2, LNMA, and FLNC. Increased Ca2+ sensitivity, sarcomere disruption, and protein aggregates are some of the few mechanisms of pathogenesis that have been revealed by studies utilizing cell lines and animal models. Additional exploration into the pathogenesis of RCM is necessary to create novel therapeutic strategies to reverse restrictive cardiomyopathic phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据