4.6 Article

Low-temperature anomalous magnetic behavior of Co2TiO4 and Co2SnO4

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 120, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4966172

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)/Department of Science and Technology (DST) [YSS/2014/000340]
  2. Department of Atomic Energy (DAE)-Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) under Young Scientist Research Award (YSRA) [34/20/02/2015/BRNS]
  3. Institute for Functional Nanomaterials University of Puerto Rico (IFN-UPR) Rio Piedras campus
  4. Fund for improvement of Science and Technology (FIST) programme of Department of Science and Technology, India [SR/FST/ PSII-020/2009]
  5. Swedish Research Council (VR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the low-temperature anomalous magnetic behavior of ferrimagnetic spinels cobalt orthotitanate (Co2TiO4), which exhibits magnetic compensation behavior across 31.74 K, and cobalt orthostannate (Co2SnO4) exhibiting two sequential magnetic transitions, namely (i) ferrimagnetic to paramagnetic transition with Neel temperature T-N similar to 41 K and reentrant spin-glass behavior with glass transition temperature T-SG similar to 39 K. The Arrott plot (H/M versus M-2) criterion has been used to extricate the order of sequential magnetic transitions occurring below TN. Negative slopes of the Arrott plots below 32 K, metamagnetic-like character of the M-H isotherms, anomalies in the specific-heat (C-P T-1 versus T) below 15 K, and a zero-crossover of isothermal magnetic-entropychange (Delta S) signify the presence of pseudo first-order discontinuous magnetic phase transition in the low-temperature regime 5K <= T <= 32 K. The dc- and ac-susceptibilities of both Co2TiO4 and Co2SnO4 are interpreted in terms of frozen-spin-clusters, which are responsible for very large magnitudes of the coercivity H-C similar to 20 kOe and bipolar-exchange bias H-EB similar to -20 kOe observed below 10 K. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据