4.7 Article

Microwave-assisted metal-ion attachment for ex-situ zirconium doping into hematite for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 694-703

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.025

关键词

Hematite photoanode; Microwave irradiation; Ex-situ doping; Zirconium ion; Photoelectrochemical water splitting

资金

  1. Climate Change Response Project [NRF-2019M1A2A2065612, NRF-2018R1A2A1A05077909]
  2. Korea-China Key Joint Research Program [2017K2A9A2A11070341]
  3. Ministry of Sci-ence and ICT (MSIT) [1.190013.01]
  4. UNIST, South Korea
  5. MSIT, South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ex-situ doping of hematite films is achieved through microwave-assisted metal ions attachment and high temperature annealing, resulting in a Zr4-doped Fe2O3/FTO photoanode with enhanced photoelectrochemical activity.
Ex-situ doping into hematite films is carried out via a short-duration (-60 s) microwave-assisted metalions attachment (MWMA) of tetravalent Zr4 thorn ion on the surface of FeOOH/FTO, followed by high temperature annealing (HTA) to fabricate Zr4 thorn :Fe2O3/FTO photoanode for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Compared to a simple dipping attachment without microwave irradiation, this MWMA allows a much larger amount of attached Zr4 thorn -ions on the FeOOH precursor, leading to a properly doped photoanode of much higher PEC activity. The primary effect of Zr4 thorn doping is to improve the charge transport characteristics in the bulk of hematite. In addition, it also boosts charge injection efficiency at the semiconductor and electrolyte interface by forming an inadvertent passivation layer and promoting hole transfer via surface states. As a result, the Zr4 thorn :Fe2O3/FTO photoanode shows a higher photocurrent density of 1.54 mA cm-2 at 1.23 VRHE under 1 Sun irradiation relative to undoped Fe2O3/FTO (1.02 mA cm-2) or Zr4 thorn :Fe2O3/FTO (1.19 mA cm-2) prepared without MWMA. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据