4.7 Article

Co-hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and PVC for clean blast furnace injection fuel production: Experiment and DFT calculation

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 156-168

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.082

关键词

Co-hydrothermal carbonization; Biomass; PVC; Blast furnace injection; Density functional theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a co-hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and examines the effects of different conditions on the characteristics of the co-HTC products. The results show that co-HTC enhances the carbon and HHV content, improves the removal efficiency of alkali metals and organic chlorine, and modifies the structure and combustion characteristics of carbon.
In this paper, a co-hydrothermal carbonization (co-HTC) process of biomass and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is proposed. The feasibility of applying the product to blast furnace injection was verified, and the effects of different temperatures, liquid-solid ratios and holding times on the characteristics of the co-HTC products of pine and PVC were studied. After co-HTC, the fixed carbon and HHV increased to varying degrees, while the H/C and O/C atomic ratios decreased. Compared with single HTC, co-HTC significantly improved the removal efficiency of the alkali metals and organic chlorine up to 94.46% and 95.61%, respectively. Moreover, a physicochemical characteristic analysis was performed, and it showed that the order degree of the hydrochar carbonaceous structure increased and that C=O and C=C decreased and increased, respectively. Moreover, the physicochemical characteristic analysis showed that the corresponding combustion characteristics deteriorated. The density functional theory calculation showed that in HTC, the elimination order of the Cl atoms at the four sites followed 2-1-3-4. Moreover, the substitution was found to be more likely to occur in the region of sites 3-4. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据