4.7 Article

Effect of simultaneous & consecutive melting/solidification of phase change material on domestic solar water heating system

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 329-348

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.059

关键词

Latent heat storage material; Charging/discharging ; Economic analysis; Environmental analysis; Exergy & energy analysis; Heat pipe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incorporation of stearic acid into heat pipe ETC can overcome challenges such as low heat transfer rate, overheating, and inability to supply hot water during off-pick hours. It improves energy and exergy efficiency and reduces CO2 emissions.
The foremost challenges in heat pipe ETC are low heat transfer rate between absorber tube & heat pipe, overheating of heat pipes, and its inability to supply hot water during off-pick hours. The incorporation of latent heat storage material (LHSM) between absorber tube and heat pipe is the efficient solution to overcome these challenges. Also, along with energy and exergy analysis, economic & environmental analysis to be done to ensure whether utilization of LHSM with ETC system is viable for the commercial utility. Thereby, in this study, energy, exergy, economic & environmental analysis of stearic acid integrated ETC for two different modes (ETC/Mode-I & II) have been done and distinctly in comparison to the reference system. The daily energy efficiency of ETC/SA for ETC/Mode-I and ETC/Mode-II improved by 37-45 and 65-81% respectively, whereas, improvement in exergy efficiency was observed by 21-29 and 57-73% respectively. The positive value of NPV shows that investment in ETC/SA will be highly profitable. The ETC/SA mitigated CO2 emission in the range of 26-37 and 8-12 tCO(2)/lifetime based on energy and exergy approach respectively. Thus, ETC/SA working for ETC/Mode-II system was found to be more economical, highly energetic & exergetic efficient, and more environmentally friendly. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据