4.7 Article

Techno-economic and environmental accounting analyses of an innovative power-to-heat concept based on solar PV systems and a geothermal heat pump

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 649-661

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.001

关键词

Power-to-heat; Solar PV plant; Geothermal heat pump; NPV; Carbon price

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the conceptualization and techno-economic-environmental analysis of a novel power-to-heat system using excess energy from solar PV plants and open-loop GHPs. The study optimizes the system design to reduce energy costs and environmental impacts.
This paper emphasizes the conceptualization and techno-economic-environmental analysis of a novel power-to-heat system based on the excess energy from solar photovoltaic (PV) plants and open-loop geothermal heat pumps (GHPs). This integrated energy system is engineered to supply simultaneously the electric load in a residential community and the heat demand in a primary school. The solar PV plant was optimized in a way to maximize the project net present value (NPV). Environmental accounting was as well introduced by estimating the total environmental penalty cost saving (TEPCS) for various carbon prices. Several scenarios were investigated, and corresponding optimum designs were determined. For annual electric and heat demand of 207.46 MWhele and 13.67 MWhth in the residential community and the primary school, respectively, the optimum PV capacity to be installed is 26 kWp when no inflation of the grid electricity cost is considered. For this optimum PV capacity, the NPV is about 19.41 k$. The annual savings and discounted payback period for this case are calculated as 4.88 k$/year and 14.45 years, respectively. Including carbon prices enhanced the economic attractiveness of the concept. For a carbon cost of 40 $/tCO2, the recommended PV capacity is 36.4 kWp giving rise to a TCS of 33.8 k$. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据