4.5 Review

Research progress on related mechanisms of uric acid activating NLRP3 inflammasome in chronic kidney disease

期刊

RENAL FAILURE
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 615-624

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2036620

关键词

Uric acid; NLRP3 inflammasomes; organelle; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Talents of scientific research fund program from Yijishan hospital affiliated Wannan Medical School [YR201918]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperuricemia is an independent risk factor for the progression of chronic kidney disease. There is a close relationship between uric acid and the NLRP3 inflammasome. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome can cause cell damage and trigger inflammatory responses through different molecular mechanisms.
Hyperuricemia is an independent risk factor for the progression of chronic kidney disease. High levels of uric acid can lead to a series of pathological conditions, such as gout, urinary stones, inflammation, and uric acid nephropathy. There is a close relationship between uric acid and the NLRP3 inflammasome. NLRP3 inflammasome activation can cause cell damage and even death through endoplasmic reticulum stress, lysosome destruction, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the interaction between the Golgi apparatus and extracellular vesicles. In addition, the NLRP3 inflammasome acts as a molecular platform, triggering the activation of caspase-1 and the lysis of IL-1 beta, IL-18 and Gasdermin D (GSDMD) through different molecular mechanisms. Cleaved NT-GSDMD forms pores in the cell membrane and triggers pyrophosphorylation, thereby inducing cell death and releasing many intracellular proinflammatory molecules. In recent years, studies have found that hyperuricemia or uric acid crystals can activate NLRP3 inflammasomes, and the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes plays an important role in kidney disease. This article reviews the possible pathophysiological mechanisms by which uric acid activates inflammasomes and induces kidney damage at the cellular and molecular levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据