4.4 Review

Review of regulatory reference values and background levels for heavy metals in the human diet

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105122

关键词

Cadmium; Arsenic; Mercury; Lead; Chromium; Dietary exposure

资金

  1. Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS) through an ILSI North America Food and Chemical Safety Committee Summer Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The US FDA has identified dietary exposure to heavy metals as a public health concern, particularly arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. Comparing established safe exposure limits with current population-based dietary background levels is a way to determine the current risk.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has identified dietary exposure to heavy metals as a public health concern, focusing particularly on arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. One way to determine current risk is to compare established safe exposure limits (reference values) with current population-based dietary background levels. Information on reference values and dietary background exposures for these metals and chromium were critically evaluated in support of an interactive risk assessment screening tool (Heavy Meals Screening Tool [HMST]). Cadmium, arsenic, and mercury background exposures from food and water were found to be below current safe US regulatory limits based on non-cancer effects, while lead background exposures were nearly equivalent to the US FDA's newest interim reference level for children. Because detections of chromium in foods are infrequent and data on speciation (trivalent versus hexavalent) are limited, chromium was excluded from the HMST. The focus of this work was to present U.S. based reference and background exposure values, although the tool can use inputs that may be more appropriate for other countries, cultures, and situations. With emerging science, new health endpoints, and changes in food consumption trends, both reference values and background exposure levels are likely to evolve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据