4.7 Article

Rational design of integrative CNTs@Ge nanotube films as binder-free electrodes for potassium storage

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 3107-3116

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-022-01998-z

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Germanium; Anodes; Alloy; Potassium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972182, 61971252]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2021YQ42, ZR2020JQ27]
  3. Youth Innovation Team Project of Shandong Provincial Education Department [2020KJN015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reports the design of integrative carbon nanotubes@germanium films as binder-free electrodes for potassium-ion batteries. The films demonstrate higher specific capacity, rate performance, and cycling stability compared to pristine germanium and carbon nanotubes electrodes. The enhanced potassium storage properties are attributed to the interconnected carbon nanotubes that effectively buffer the volume expansion of germanium during alloying/dealloying process.
Alloying materials hold great potential as the anodes for potassium-ion batteries (KIBs). However, the large volume changes during K+ alloying/dealloying reactions can lead to structural damage of the electrodes, resulting in fast capacity loss and shortened cycle life. Herein, we report the design of integrative carbon nanotubes@germanium (CNTs@Ge) films on copper foil by combined chemical and physical vapor deposition. Electrochemical tests show that the integrative CNTs@Ge films, working as binder-free electrodes, demonstrate higher specific capacity and rate performance in comparison with pristine Ge and CNTs electrodes. In addition, the CNTs@Ge films also deliver a long cycling stability with an areal specific capacity of 0.0417 mAh.cm(-2) after 450 cycles at 1000 mu A.cm(-2). The enhanced potassium storage properties can be attributed to the interweaved CNTs with abundant space that can effectively buffer the volume expansion of Ge during alloying/dealloying process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据