4.5 Article

Kaizen Process Improvement in Radiology: Primer for Creating a Culture of Continuous Quality

期刊

RADIOGRAPHICS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 919-928

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/rg.210086

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kaizen process improvement is a key element of lean production, focusing on continuous improvement through small incremental changes and waste elimination. In the healthcare setting, this approach has been proven successful with the guidance of trained facilitators and coaches, emphasizing the development of a learning organization and respecting individuals.
Kaizen process improvement is an element of lean production that is an approach to creating continuous improvement. Kaizen is based on the idea that small ongoing positive changes in workflow and elimination of waste can yield major improvements over time. A focused Kaizen event, or rapid process improvement event, can lead to sustainable process improvement in health care settings that are resistant to change. This approach has been proven to be successful in health care. These events are led by a trained facilitator and coach who provides appropriate team education and engagement. To ensure success, the team must embrace the Kaizen culture, which emphasizes the development of a learning organization that is focused on relentless pursuit of perfection. The culture empowers all staff to improve the work they perform, with an emphasis on the process and not the individual. Respect for individual people is key in Kaizen. In radiology, this method has been successful in empowering frontline staff to improve their individual workflows. A 5-day Kaizen event has been successful in increasing on-time starts, decreasing lead time, increasing patient and staff satisfaction, and ensuring sustainability. Sustainable success can occur when the team stays true to lean principles, engages leaders, and empowers team members with the use of timely data to drive decision making. (C) RSNA, 2022

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据