4.7 Article

Are psychological debriefing groups after a potential traumatic event suitable to prevent the symptoms of PTSD?

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 311, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114503

关键词

Acute stress disorder; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Debriefing groups; Crisis intervention; Early intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical benefits of psychological debriefing groups on PTSD symptoms after a potential traumatic event are limited. High-quality studies are needed to determine the specific effects of psychological debriefing groups on PTSD symptoms.
Psychological debriefing is a psychotherapeutic approach developed for early intervention in civilians and professionals who have to cope with a potential traumatic event (PTE). Although initial works claimed that this approach may decrease symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), some studies have concluded that the clinical benefits of psychological debriefing were limited. Several methodological variations could explain the discrepancies observed among studies. Among these variations, how the approach is administered to participants should have importance, and clinical evidence suggests that debriefing groups instead of individuals could have a beneficial clinical effect. We conducted a systematic search of the literature investigating the clinical effects of psychological debriefing groups on PTSD symptoms after a PTE according to the PRISMA guidelines. Among the 790 articles found, 11 met our inclusion criteria. Most of these articles did not support any beneficial effect of psychological debriefing groups on PTSD symptoms. A large number of methodological variations that may influence the outcomes of these studies were observed. Psychological debriefing groups did not seem efficient in alleviating PTSD symptoms. Further studies of high methodological quality are needed to elucidate the effect of psychological debriefing groups on specific PTSD symptoms and on nonspecific symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据