4.5 Review

Recent developments in data acquisition, treatment and analysis with ion mobility-mass spectrometry for lipidomics

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 22, 期 15-16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202100328

关键词

acquisition; data; databases; ion mobility; lipidomics; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Ministry of Universities [FPU19/06206]
  2. Fundacion La Caixa Grant [HR17-00634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the latest developments in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (IM-MS) analyses for lipidomics, focusing on the acquisition modes, data pre-treatment and analysis methods, as well as the calculation of Collision Cross Section (CCS) values for lipid identification.
Lipids are involved in many biological processes and their study is constantly increasing. To identify a lipid among thousand requires of reliable methods and techniques. Ion Mobility (IM) can be coupled with Mass Spectrometry (MS) to increase analytical selectivity in lipid analysis of lipids. IM-MS has experienced an enormous development in several aspects, including instrumentation, sensitivity, amount of information collected and lipid identification capabilities. This review summarizes the latest developments in IM-MS analyses for lipidomics and focuses on the current acquisition modes in IM-MS, the approaches for the pre-treatment of the acquired data and the subsequent data analysis. Methods and tools for the calculation of Collision Cross Section (CCS) values of analytes are also reviewed. CCS values are commonly studied to support the identification of lipids, providing a quasi-orthogonal property that increases the confidence level in the annotation of compounds and can be matched in CCS databases. The information contained in this review might be of help to new users of IM-MS to decide the adequate instrumentation and software to perform IM-MS experiments for lipid analyses, but also for other experienced researchers that can reconsider their routines and protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据