4.7 Article

Assessment of durability and zinc activity of zinc-rich primer coatings by electrochemical noise technique

期刊

PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.106840

关键词

3-Coat; Zinc-rich primer; Corrosion; Electrochemical noise; Noise resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-coat system is widely used for corrosion protection of steel bridges. The electrochemical noise technique can be used to evaluate the corrosion performance of coatings and identify the activation and passive transition of zinc pigments. It reflects the barrier quality of intact coatings and the behavior of the zinc/steel interface.
The three-coat system consisting of a zinc-rich primer, epoxy midcoat, and polyurethane topcoat has been widely adopted for corrosion protection of structural steel bridges. Corrosion mitigation is afforded by the barrier characteristics of the various layers as well as beneficial galvanic coupling of the zinc pigments in the primer to the steel substrate when subjected to corrosive environments such as with moisture ingress and coating defects. The dispersed zinc pigments in the binder require adequate electronic coupling in order to provide the beneficial electrochemical coupling of the zinc to the steel. The application of the electrochemical noise (EN) technique to identify coating corrosion performance was reviewed in controlled laboratory tests. Zinc pigment activation and transition to passive-like conditions in defect and defect-free coating specimens could be identified by EN. The characteristic charge of noise events resolved by shot noise analysis was demonstrated to be related to anodic polarization of extended active zinc pigments adjacent to coating defect sites galvanically coupled to the exposed steel and passivated zinc pigments. Electrochemical noise resistance was shown to convey zinc/steel interfacial behavior in cases with sufficient activity but largely reflects coating barrier quality for intact coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据