4.6 Article

Performance evaluation of composite-barrier system against migration of tin from radioactive wastes: Approaches in terms of risk assessments

期刊

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104181

关键词

Tin; Composite barrier material; Radioactive waste; Thermodynamic parameters; Kinetics; Risk assessments

资金

  1. Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects Unit [TDK-2018-41684]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a polymer/zeolite-based composite barrier material was prepared and its performance against 126Sn isotope in a radioactive waste repository was investigated. The adsorption behavior of tin ions on the barrier material was analyzed using isotherms and kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. The risk of 126Sn migration and the associated health risks were assessed using Monte Carlo Simulation Software.
In this study, a polymer/zeolite-based composite barrier material was prepared and its performance against 126Sn isotope under varying conditions in radioactive waste repository was investigated. Adsorption isotherms and kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were calculated from the data obtained by examining 126Sn in its interaction with the barrier material under varying parameters such as different initial concentrations, interaction time and temperature. It has been observed that the adsorption of tin ions on the barrier material fitted into the D-R isotherm model. The adsorption of the tin onto the barrier was determined to be endothermic from the thermodynamic parameters. From the kinetic evaluation, it has been seen that the tin adsorption process was compatible with the pseudo second-order model. The risk of migration of 126Sn as a result of an accident in radioactive waste repository was assessed using by GOLDSIM Monte Carlo Simulation Software. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks and excess lifetime cancer risks of tin were evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据