4.8 Article

MicroRNA-29a attenuates CD8 T cell exhaustion and induces memory-like CD8 T cells during chronic infection

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106083119

关键词

CD8 T cells; microRNA; exhaustion

资金

  1. NIH [5-R21-AI-144732-02, AI105343, AI112521, AI082630, AI201085, AI117950, HL109102, HL107202]
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30CA240139]
  3. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  4. cancer immunology program at the University of Pennsylvania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies miR-29a as a key regulator of exhausted CD8 T cells (TEX) during chronic viral infection. It shows that miR-29a improves CD8 T cell responses, inhibits exhaustion-driving transcriptional pathways, and regulates ribosomal biogenesis. As a result, miR-29a promotes a memory-like CD8 T cell differentiation state during chronic infection.
CD8 T cells mediate protection against intracellular pathogens and tumors. However, persistent antigen during chronic infections or cancer leads to T cell exhaustion, suboptimal functionality, and reduced protective capacity. Despite considerable work interrogating the transcriptional regulation of exhausted CD8 T cells (TEX), the posttranscriptional control of TEX remains poorly understood. Here, we interrogated the role of microRNAs (miRs) in CD8 T cells responding to acutely resolved or chronic viral infection and identified miR-29a as a key regulator of TEX. Enforced expression of miR-29a improved CD8 T cell responses during chronic viral infection and antagonized exhaustion. miR-29a inhibited exhaustion-driving transcriptional pathways, including inflammatory and T cell receptor signaling, and regulated ribosomal biogenesis. As a result, miR-29a fostered a memory-like CD8 T cell differentiation state during chronic infection. Thus, we identify miR-29a as a key regulator of TEX and define mechanisms by which miR-29a can divert exhaustion toward a more beneficial memory-like CD8 T cell differentiation state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据