4.8 Article

Single-cell transcriptomic classification of rabies-infected cortical neurons

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2203677119

关键词

rabies virus; transcriptomics; cell types; circuit tracing; gene expression

资金

  1. NIH [R34 NS116885]
  2. NIH Diversity Supplement [R01 EY022577]
  3. Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans
  4. NIH-National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center [P30 014195, S10-OD023689]
  5. Allen Institute for Brain Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using modified rabies virus for cortical circuit tracing can identify input neurons directly connecting to neurons of interest. We used single-nucleus RNA sequencing to study the gene expression profiles of rabies-infected neurons and found that they can be characterized transcriptomically despite global and cell-type-specific transcriptional changes induced by rabies.
Cortical circuit tracing using modified rabies virus can identify input neurons making direct monosynaptic connections onto neurons of interest. However, challenges remain in our ability to establish the cell type identity of rabies-labeled input neurons. While transcriptomics may offer an avenue to characterize inputs, the extent of rabies-induced transcriptional changes in distinct neuronal cell types remains unclear, and whether these changes preclude characterization of rabies-infected neurons according to established transcriptomic cell types is unknown. We used single-nucleus RNA sequencing to survey the gene expression profiles of rabies-infected neurons and assessed their correspondence with established transcriptomic cell types. We demonstrated that when using transcriptome-wide RNA profiles, rabies-infected cortical neurons can be transcriptomically characterized despite global and cell-type-specific rabies-induced transcriptional changes. Notably, we found differential modulation of neuronal marker gene expression, suggesting that caution should be taken when attempting to characterize rabies-infected cells with single genes or small gene sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据