4.3 Article

Ecological optimization and LCA of TiO2-SiC/ water hybrid nanofluid in a shell and tube heat exchanger by ANN

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089221093304

关键词

Nanofluid; life cycle analysis; ecological function; shell and tube heat exchanger; ANN

资金

  1. Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur
  2. Ministry of Human-Resource Development (MHRD), Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimates the environmental impact and cost model for the early-stage design of a shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE), and compares the effectiveness of using nanofluid in the chemical processing industry. The results show that nanofluids improve heat transfer and have higher economic value compared to typical coolant systems. The suggested novel method is cost-effective and environmentally feasible.
The current study estimates the environmental impact and cost model for the early-stage design of a shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE). Additionally, the lifecycle analysis (LCA) compares the effects of use of nanofluid in the chemical processing industry to increase the effectiveness of the heat transfer to the typical STHE system. Nanofluids increase heat transfer, as evidenced by the results of the experiments. The Nusselt number and pressure drop were both increased by roughly 65% and 8%, respectively, using 0.5 vol% of TiO2-SiC/water hybrid nanofluid compared to water as coolant. The ecological impact of STHE was estimated as s attribute of Ecological (E-F) and total cost estimation function using artificial neural networks (ANN). Finally, the IdematLightLCA (2.8.6 version) software was used to calculate energy content, Carbon footprint, and cost over the lifespan of the baseline. The results show that nanofluid-based STHE has an average payback period considerably longer than typical coolant systems but saves superior economic value at the end of its lifetime. According to the findings, the suggested novel method is both cost-effective and environmentally feasible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据