4.5 Article

Risk factors associated with lumpy skin disease in cattle in West Kazakhstan

期刊

PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105660

关键词

Cattle; Lumpy skin disease; Prevalence; Risk factors; West Kazakhstan

资金

  1. Bolashak international scholarship programme, The Republic of Kazakhstan [3680]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the epidemiology and associated risk factors of lumpy skin disease in the West Kazakhstan region. The findings revealed the transmission routes and factors influencing the disease, contributing to the prevention and control of future outbreaks.
Lumpy skin disease is an important emerging disease posing a threat to the livestock industry worldwide. Moreover, factors involved in disease transmission in the field and at farm level remain unidentified. This research was based on a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews with affected farmers. From January 2021 to July 2021, 543 households were visited in four provinces of the West Kazakhstan region to assess the prevalence of LSD and its associated risk factors. Animal and farm level risk factors were examined using univariable and multivariable mixed effect logistic regression. At animal level, the factors associated with LSD outbreaks include herd size Medium OR = 0.68, (95% CI: 0.54-0.84); large OR = 0.63, (95% CI: 0.49-0.81), purchasing animals OR = 11.67, (95% CI: 8.87-15.35), and selling animals during LSD outbreak OR = 1.24, (95% CI: 1.06-1.45). The overall animal level and herd level LSD prevalence were 10.2% (95% CI: 9.6-0.10.9) and 49.2% (95% CI: 45.0 - 53.4) respectively. Our study demonstrates the dissemination of LSDV from primary outbreaks to new areas and risk factors associated with LSD in Kazakhstan. This finding will enhance knowledge on disease epidemiology and help develop coordinated actions in pre-vention and control of the possible LSD outbreaks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据