4.4 Article

International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis Updated Position Statement on the use of genome-wide sequencing for prenatal diagnosis

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 796-803

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6157

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research and clinical use of genome-wide sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses at risk for genetic disorders have greatly increased in recent years. This study recommends responsible clinical implementation and diagnostic use of prenatal sequencing through standardized laboratory practices and detailed counseling.
The research and clinical use of genome-wide sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses at risk for genetic disorders have rapidly increased in recent years. Current data indicate that the diagnostic rate is comparable and for certain indications higher than that of standard testing by karyotype and chromosomal microarray. Responsible clinical implementation and diagnostic use of prenatal sequencing depends on standardized laboratory practices and detailed pre-test and post-test counseling. This Updated Position Statement on behalf of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis recommends best practices for the clinical use of prenatal exome and genome sequencing from an international perspective. We include several new points for consideration by researchers and clinical service and laboratory providers. Key points What is already known about this topic? In 2018, the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis published the first Position Statement on the use genome-wide sequencing, which was then an emerging technology, in the diagnostic work-up of pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital anomalies. What does this study add? Since then, there has been a significant growth in the experience with prenatal genome-wide sequencing. This new Position Statement replaces the 2018 statement with updated information on the technologies, experience, and recommended practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据