4.7 Article

Reduction kinetics of combusted iron powder using hydrogen

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 407, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117540

关键词

Thermogravimetric analysis; Metal fuels; Direct reduced iron; Hydrogen; Reduction kinetics; Iron powder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen reduction of iron oxide fines produced by iron combustion was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that the morphology of the reduction products depended on temperature but not on the hydrogen partial pressure, with higher temperatures leading to larger pore sizes. Based on analysis, the reduction process could be described by a single-step phase boundary controlled reaction at temperatures below 600℃, and a multi-step mechanism was required for reactions at higher temperatures.
Despite extensive research on reduction of iron oxides in literature, there is no consensus on the most accurate reduction kinetics, especially for micron-sized iron oxide powders with high purity. Such data is particularly important for the application of metal fuels and chemical looping combustion, in which high purity iron powders function as dense energy carriers. Hence, in this work, hydrogen reduction of iron oxide fines, produced by iron combustion, were investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The isothermal reduction experiments were conducted at the temperature range of 400-900 ?C and at hydrogen partial pressures of 0.25-1.0 atm. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the morphology of the reduction products depends on the reduction temperature but not on the hydrogen partial pressure. Reduction at higher temperatures leads to larger pore sizes. Based on an extended Hancock-Sharp lnln -method the appropriate gas-solid reaction models are determined, suggesting that the reduction can be described by a single-step phase boundary controlled reaction at temperatures below 600 ?C, whereas a multistep mechanism is required for the description of reactions at higher temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据