4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and discrete element modeling for particle-scale powder spreading dynamics in powder-bed-fusion-based additive manufacturing

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117390

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Particle spreading; Jamming; Powder packing state

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines experiments and simulation to systematically investigate powder spreading dynamics, introducing an experimental calibration method for powder layer height and blade geometry. The study identifies the contributions to packing density fluctuations from various factors and establishes the importance of long-duration jamming events for the formation of empty patches. The results provide insights for optimizing particle packing and support subsequent modeling of laser-material interaction and melt pool dynamics.
Experiments and discrete element method simulation are combined to systematically reveal the particle-scale powder spreading dynamics based on the actual situation in additive manufacturing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that introduces experimental calibration of powder layer height and line-contact triangular blade in the simulation. The results show that contributions of powder bed to the packing density fluctuations originate from the combined effect of gap height, particle jamming, and scraping effect. Due to the presence of force arches, long-duration jamming events with duration more than 5 times the normalized survival time, are necessary for the formation of empty patch. Instantaneous scraping effects lead to particle collisions and elastic deformation, which enhances the sensitivity of particle bursts after the blade. Overall, this study establishes a practical solution to optimize the particle packing state and provides support for subsequent modeling of laser-material interaction and melt pool dynamics. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据