4.7 Article

Orthogonal vortices characteristic, performance evaluation and classification mechanism of a horizontal classifier with three rotor cages

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117438

关键词

Air classification; Turbo air classifier; Gas-solid flow; Performance evaluation; Classification mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904088]
  2. Scientic research project of col-leges and universities in Hebei province [BJ2020042]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2021208017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the gas-solid simulation, performance evaluation, and classification mechanism of a horizontal classifier with three rotor cages. The study finds that this classifier has competitive advantages of larger process capacity and smaller cut size, and can achieve high-quality classification.
Horizontal classifiers with multiple rotor cages have competitive advantages of larger process capacity and smaller cut size. This study represents the gas-solid simulation, performance evaluation and classification mechanism of a horizontal classifier with three rotor cages. The gas turbulence was modeled using the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and the particle flow was predicted by the dispersed phase model (DPM). More than fifty operating conditions were analyzed for the performance evaluation. A schematic map showing the gas-solid flow dynamics was constructed. It was found that three rotating gas screen are independently induced and evenly distributed around the rotor cages. The M-shaped axial and tangential velocities have strong shear and washing effect on the near-wall particle. The maximum particle residence time of the cut size can be hundreds of seconds. The experimental cut sizes range from 7.2 pm to 25.7 pm with high classifying sharpness index (>55%) and superfine particle yield (>71%).(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据