4.7 Article

Dietary administration of Bacillus subtilis KC1 improves growth performance, immune response, heat stress tolerance, and disease resistance of broiler chickens

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101693

关键词

Bacillus subtilis; Salmonella Pullorum; Mycoplasma gallisepticum; heat stress; Aflatoxin B1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study evaluated the probiotic properties of Bacillus subtilis KC1 as a feed additive in poultry feed. The supplementation of Bacillus subtilis improved growth performance, heat-stress tolerance, resistance to Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Salmonella Pullorum challenge, as well as liver function and immune response of broilers challenged with Aflatoxin B1. These results suggest a tremendous potential of Bacillus subtilis KC1 as a feed additive in poultry feed.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the probiotic properties of Bacillus subtilis KC1 as a feed additive in the poultry feed. Effects of the Bacillus subtilis supplementation on growth performance, heat-stress tolerance, resistance to Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Salmonella Pullorum challenge of broilers were determined. The protective effects of the Bacillus subtilis on liver function and immune response of broilers challenged with Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) were also scrutinized. The results showed that the Bacillus subtilis supplementation could improve growth performance, increased body weight, relative weight of the immune organ and dressing percentage, and decrease feed conversion ratio. In addition, the Bacillus subtilis supplementation alleviated adverse effects caused by heat stress, MG, and Salmonella Pullorum challenge. Furthermore, the Bacillus subtilis supplementation resulted in improved liver function and enhanced immune response of broilers challenged with AFB1. In conclusion, these results suggested a tremendous potential of Bacillus subtilis KC1 as a feed additive in the poultry feed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据