4.7 Article

Impact of post-harvest treatments on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of coffee beans in Huila, Colombia

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111852

关键词

Post-harvest; Roasting; Antioxidant capacity; Bioactive components; Caffeine; 5-hydroxymethylfurfural

资金

  1. Universidad Surcolombiana [USCO-VIPS-3050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different post-harvest methods and roasting intensity were studied for their impact on physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant capacity and bioactive compounds content of Colombia Arabica coffee samples. Results showed strong modifications in parameters like color, antioxidant capacity, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural content due to roasting. PCA explained 87.4% of sample variability, with antioxidants and hydroxymethylfurfural related to roasting degree.
Post-harvest methods applied on coffee cherries processing impact the resulting physicochemical characteristics, and the roasting modulates the beans composition, influencing their sensory analysis. Thus, this work studied the influence of different post-harvest methods (dry, wet and semi-dry) and roasting intensity on the physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS) and bioactive compounds content of coffee (C. arabica L. var. Colombia) samples. Additionally, sensory attributes were determined. The results showed that the degree of roasting modified strongly all the investigated parameters, mainly colour, antioxidant capacity and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural content. Furthermore, the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) explained 87.4 % of the variability of the samples and the results of the antioxidants and hydroxymethylfurfural are related to the roasting degree, while the pH and the chlomgenic acids content allow discriminating the green samples. Finally, the post-harvest methods determined the sensory profile, resulting in coffees with highly differentiated characteristics and classified as Specialty coffee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据