4.7 Article

Healable, recyclable and mechanically robust elastomers with multiple dynamic cross-linking bonds

期刊

POLYMER
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124900

关键词

ENR Mechanical strength; Dynamic covalent bond; Self-healing; Recyclability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973067]
  2. Key Projects of Basic Research and Applied Basic Research in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province [2018KZDXM004]
  3. Special project for innovation of high-end scientific research institutions in Zhongshan City [2019AG013, 61409220414/JZX7Y2019026206860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel self-healing epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) with high tensile strength has been developed by using a simple crosslinking strategy with a cross-linker consisting of triple dynamic covalent bonds. The ENR exhibits a high self-healing efficiency without external force and can be recycled multiple times.
The cross-linked network structure bestows rubber with excellent mechanical properties, but it greatly limits the self-healing and reprocessing ability of rubber. Herein, to address the above problem, we propose a simple crosslinking strategy with the cross-linker consisting of triple dynamic covalent bonds to vulcanize epoxidized natural rubber (ENR). A dynamic covalent network remarkably enhanced the mechanical properties of ENR through the combination of dynamic covalent bonds in the cross-linked network. At the same time, abundant dynamic covalent bonds rearranged the network topology through reversible exchange. As a result, a novel self-healing ENR with high tensile strength (2.06 +/- 0.12 MPa) has been successfully developed. The ENR exhibits a high (97 +/- 3%) self-healing efficiency (after 30 h at 70. C) without applying any external force. Furthermore, it can be recycled more than three times. This work could enlighten researchers in academia and industry to develop selfhealing elastomers with mechanical strength and reprocessing ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据