4.7 Article

Reprocessable polyhydroxyurethane networks reinforced with reactive polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) and exhibiting excellent elevated temperature creep resistance

期刊

POLYMER
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124971

关键词

-

资金

  1. Walter P. Murphy Professorship
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Bioenergy Technologies Office Award [DE-EE0008928]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using POSS to enhance the reprocessable polyhydroxyurethane network composites, which exhibit improved storage modulus and creep resistance, and can undergo melt-state reprocessing at high temperature with 100% property recovery.
The rapid development of covalent adaptable networks or vitrimers shows promise for addressing the long-standing recycling issues associated with conventional, permanently cross-linked thermosets. At the same time, it is important to demonstrate that properties of reprocessable polymer networks can be optimized to meet the ongoing demand for high-performance materials. We have fabricated reprocessable polyhydroxyurethane (PHU) network composites reinforced with reactive polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS). With functionalized POSS serving as a fraction of the cross-linkers, the PHU-POSS network nanocomposites exhibit significantly enhanced storage modulus at the rubbery plateau region relative to the neat PHU network. With up to 10 wt% POSS loading, these network composites can undergo melt-state reprocessing at 140 ? with 100% property recovery associated with cross-link density. We also show that hydroxyurethane dynamic chemistry leads to excellent creep resistance at elevated temperature up to 90 ? and is unaffected by reactive incorporation of POSS. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of POSS as nanofillers for designing high-performance, organic-inorganic dynamic PHU networks with excellent reprocessability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据