4.7 Article

Characterization and modelling of bisphenol-a type epoxy polymer over a wide range of rates and temperatures

期刊

POLYMER
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124860

关键词

Epoxy; Dynamic mechanical analysis; High-rate; Temperature -strain-rate equivalence; Three-network (TN) model

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF [FA9550-15-1-0448]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the mechanical properties of epoxy resins under different strain rates and temperatures using experiments and model fitting. By applying the principle of time-temperature equivalence, a constitutive model is developed to accurately predict the stress-strain behavior of the material.
Epoxy resins are employed in many engineering applications in which mechanical properties at different strain rates and temperatures must be quantified for effective use. It is known that these properties are related through the principle of time-temperature equivalence. In this paper, the application of this equivalence is explored in detail, at both small and large strains, and used as part of a strategy for calibrating a constitutive model that can reproduce the stress-strain behaviour in different mechanical conditions. In order to achieve this, quasi-static compression experiments were performed at temperatures from -40 to +40 degrees C in a screw-driven load frame; room temperature rate dependent experiments were performed from 0.0005 to 6300 s-1 using a screw-driven load frame, hydraulic compression system and Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar apparatus. Dynamic mechanical analysis and differential scanning calorimetry were also performed. A three-network (TN) polymer model was fit to the mechanical behaviour up to a strain of 0.5. This model, combined with time-temperature based mappings gave a good understanding of the thermomechanical behaviour of the material, and also demonstrates an approach that can be used for a wide range of polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据