4.6 Article

A rapid, specific, extraction-less, and cost-effective RT-LAMP test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266703

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes an extraction-less method for the rapid qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in upper respiratory specimens using reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). The test exhibits high sensitivity, specificity, and does not require RNA extraction, making it suitable for use in various laboratory and remote settings.
In 2019 a newly identified coronavirus, designated as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread rapidly from the epicenter in Wuhan (China) to more than 150 countries around the world, causing the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this study, we describe an extraction-less method based on reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) intended for the rapid qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory specimens, including oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs, anterior nasal and mid-turbinate nasal swabs, nasopharyngeal washes/aspirates or nasal aspirates as well as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. The assay's performance was evaluated and compared to an RT quantitative PCR-based assay (FDA-approved). With high sensitivity, specificity, and bypassing the need for RNA extraction, the RT-LAMP Rapid Detection assay is a valuable and fast test for an accurate and rapid RNA detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and potentially other pathogens. Additionally, the versatility of this test allows its application in virtually every laboratory setting and remote location where access to expensive laboratory equipment is a limiting factor for testing during pandemic crises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据