4.6 Article

Hedonic pricing analysis for semen of dairy bulls in Brazil

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267109

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [302792/2019-8]
  2. EMBRAPA Gado de Leite -Juiz de Fora
  3. Universidade Federal de Juiz de For a (UFJF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dairy farming plays a significant role in the Brazilian agricultural sector, contributing to the rural economy. Artificial insemination has become crucial for genetic improvement, making semen doses of bulls highly marketable. The study reveals that proven bulls command a premium price, Gir bulls' semen doses are more expensive, and AI firm ALTA offers a discount. Sexed doses are highly valued, while semen doses from dead bulls are pricier.
Dairy farming is an important aspect of the Brazilian agricultural sector. The presence of numerous producers has created a large number of jobs in this field, contributing significantly to the rural economy. Artificial insemination (AI), used as one of the main means of reproduction, is increasingly gaining importance in the genetic improvement of animals. Given this scenario, the semen of bulls has become extremely marketable and an important aspect of the animal industry. This study aims to develop a hedonic model for the price of semen doses of dairy bulls based on the information from the main sellers of the product in the Brazilian market. The main findings reveal that there is an additional premium for proven bulls. Semen doses from Gir bulls proved to be more expensive, and the AI firm ALTA has a discount compared to the other firms. From the characteristics obtained in the tests, there is a premium only for the Predicted Transmitting Ability-Milk (volume). The most valued feature found is the dose being sexed, that is, the dose that guarantees the gestation of a female from its use. Semen doses from dead bulls has proved to be more expensive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据