相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Multiple comparisons: a tutorial. Part 1. Understanding hypothesis testing
Michael T. Lawson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Insufficient transparency of statistical reporting in preclinical research: a scoping review
Romain-Daniel Gosselin
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*
Nathalie Percie du Sert et al.
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM (2020)
Robustness of individual and marginal model-based estimates: A sensitivity analysis of flexible parametric models
Elisavet Syriopoulou et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
A method for ordinal outcomes: The ordered stereotype model
Daniel Fernandez et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH (2019)
Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies
Carlijn R. Hooijmans et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
What exactly is 'N' in cell culture and animal experiments?
Stanley E. Lazic et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2018)
Increasing efficiency of preclinical research by group sequential designs
Konrad Neumann et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
The Experimental Design Assistant
Nathalie Percie du Sert et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke
Constance Holman et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Statistical considerations for preclinical studies
Inmaculada B. Aban et al.
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY (2015)
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
Malcolm R. Macleod et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm
Tracey L. Weissgerber et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically
Emily S. Sena et al.
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM (2014)
Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide
H. M. Vesterinen et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS (2014)
Bar charts and box plots
Marc Streit et al.
NATURE METHODS (2014)
A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data
Emmeke Aarts et al.
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2014)
Assessing proportionality assumption in the adjacent category logistic regression model
Anil Dolgun et al.
STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE (2014)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Animal models of bone cancer pain: Systematic review and meta-analyses
Gillian L. Currie et al.
PAIN (2013)
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Story C. Landis et al.
NATURE (2012)
In search of preclinical robustness
Ian S. Peers et al.
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY (2012)
Preclinical studies of human disease: Time to take methodological quality seriously
H. Bart van der Worp et al.
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY (2011)
Why animal research needs to improve
Malcolm Macleod
NATURE (2011)
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Carol Kilkenny et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2010)
Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?
H. Bart van der Worp et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2010)
Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies - A metaepidemiologic approach
Nicolas A. Crossley et al.
STROKE (2008)
How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke?
Emily Sena et al.
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES (2007)
Translation of research evidence from animals to humans
Daniel G. Hackam et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Emergency medicine animal research: Does use of randomization and blinding affect the results?
V Bebarta et al.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (2003)
On measurement properties of continuation ratio models
BT Hemker et al.
PSYCHOMETRIKA (2001)
Adjusting for multiple testing - when and how?
R Bender et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2001)
The ordinal controversy revisited
J Kampen et al.
QUALITY & QUANTITY (2000)