4.6 Article

Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of Inulin-Type Fructans, Used in Synbiotic Combination with Lactobacillus spp. Against Candida albicans

期刊

PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 212-219

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11130-022-00966-3

关键词

Inulin-type fructans; Probiotic; Prebiotic; Antimicrobial effect; Antibiofilm activity

资金

  1. CONACYT [662891]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the antibacterial effects of prebiotics and probiotics in combination on Candida albicans. The results showed that the combination of inulin-type fructans with Lactobacillus paracasei or Lactobacillus plantarum inhibited the growth and biofilm formation of C. albicans. Gas chromatography analysis revealed that lactic acid was the dominant metabolite produced.
There is great interest in the search for new alternatives to antimicrobial drugs, and the use of prebiotics and probiotics is a promising approach to this problem. This study aimed to assess the effect of inulin-type fructans, used in synbiotic combinations with Lactobacillus paracasei or Lactobacillus plantarum, on the production of short-chain fatty acids and antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans. The inhibition assay using the L. paracasei and L. plantarum supernatants resulting from the metabolization of inulin-type fructans displayed growth inhibition and antibiofilm formation against C. albicans. Inhibition occurred at concentrations of 12.5, 25, and 50% of the L. paracasei supernatant and at a concentration of 50% of the L. plantarum supernatant. The analysis of short-chain fatty acids by gas chromatography showed that lactic acid was the dominating produced metabolite. However, acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were also detected in supernatants from both probiotics. Therefore, the synbiotic formulation of L. paracasei or L. plantarum in the presence of inulin-type fructans constitutes with anticandidal effect is a possible option to produce antifungal drugs or antimicrobial compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据