4.5 Article

Computational analysis identified accelerated senescence as a significant contribution to preeclampsia pathophysiology

期刊

PLACENTA
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 70-78

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.03.005

关键词

Placenta; Preeclampsia; Preterm; Senescence; Transcriptomics

资金

  1. Canada Research Chair in maternal fetal health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the significant role of placental senescence in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The mechanism of senescence varies among different subtypes of preeclampsia, which could serve as a basis for identifying potential drug targets.
Introduction: Preeclampsia is a heterogenous disorder of pregnancy that has distinct subtypes based on the phenotype of the placenta. In all pregnancies, there is a progressive loss of placental function throughout gestation due to increasing placental senescence. The aim of our study was to determine, through bioinformatic analyses, if accelerated or abnormal placental senescence underlies the development of the different subtypes of preeclampsia. Methods: Gene expression datasets were processed in R using the limma package for quantification and differential expression and the camera function for gene set enrichment. The pro-and anti-senescence gene sets were obtained from CellAge (https://genomics.senescence.info/cells/). Results: We demonstrate an overall downregulation of anti-senescence genes across healthy and preeclamptic placentas as a function of gestation that is accelerated in certain subtypes of preeclampsia. We also discovered that while senescence-related signatures are common to preeclampsia, they represented unique biological pathways to different subtypes of the disease. Discussion: Overall, our results support the role of senescence as a mediator in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. We describe possible mechanistic differences between the role of senescence in different subtypes of preeclampsia that could provide a basis for identifying drug targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据