4.7 Article

Lanostane-type triterpenoids from the mycelial mat of Ganoderma lucidum and their hepatoprotective activities

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113131

关键词

Ganoderma lucidum; Polyporaceae; Lanostane triterpenoids; Ganoderic acid derivatives; Hepatoprotective

资金

  1. Liaoning Provincial Innovation Center of exploration and application technique of rare and endangered medicinal resources [Liao Ke Fa [2015]54]
  2. Education Department of Liaoning Province [L2015517]
  3. College Students' Innovation Training Program [S202010163023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated and identified 10 undescribed lanostane triterpenoids and 21 known compounds from statically cultured mycelial mat of G. lucidum. The hepatoprotective activities of these compounds in H2O2-induced HepG2 cells were evaluated, and the structure-activity relationship was discussed.
Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum), a well-known Polyporaceae family fungus, is valued for its edibility and medicinal properties. It is a rich source of active polysaccharides and triterpenoids. However, obtaining material for medicinal purposes relies on artificial cultivation in a greenhouse, which requires large amounts of tree trunk due to the low biomass transformation rate. Therefore, an effective and environment-friendly culture method should be developed and the chemical compounds in the cultured material should be studied. Here we report the isolation and structural elucidation of 10 undescribed lanostane triterpenoids and 21 known compounds from statically cultured mycelial mat of G. lucidum. The hepatoprotective activity of these compounds in H2O2- induced HepG2 cells was evaluated. The structure-activity relationship is discussed. Our results demonstrated that twelve ganoderic acid derivatives possess significant hepatoprotective activities, as judged by suppressed activities of ALT, AST and LDH and increased GSH levels in H2O2-injured HepG2 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据