4.8 Article

Measuring High-Order Phonon Correlations in an Optomechanical Resonator

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 128, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.183601

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1707703]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-15-1-0270, FA955-21-10152]
  3. Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship [N00014-20-1-2628]
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation [DT121914]
  5. ONR MURI on Quantum Optomechanics [N00014-15-1-2761]
  6. Quantum Information Science Enabled Discovery (QuantISED) for High Energy Physics [KA2401032]
  7. IC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  8. Research Experience for Veteran Undergraduates (REVU) program - Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  9. Division Of Physics
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1707703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, single photon detectors are used to investigate the motional state of a superfluid He-4 resonator with a mass of about 1 ng. The arrival times of Stokes and anti-Stokes photons, scattered by the acoustic mode of the resonator, are utilized to measure the resonator's phonon coherences up to the fourth order. By selecting specific photon detection events, the coherences in the resonator are also measured when <= 3 phonons are added or subtracted. These measurements are consistent with the predictions assuming a Markovian coupling between the acoustic mode and a thermal bath.
We use single photon detectors to probe the motional state of a superfluid He-4 resonator of mass similar to 1 ng. The arrival times of Stokes and anti-Stokes photons (scattered by the resonator's acoustic mode) are used to measure the resonator's phonon coherences up to the fourth order. By postselecting on photon detection events, we also measure coherences in the resonator when <= 3 phonons have been added or subtracted. These measurements are found to be consistent with predictions that assume the acoustic mode to be in thermal equilibrium with a bath through a Markovian coupling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据