4.8 Article

Global Phase Diagram of the Normal State of Twisted Bilayer Graphene

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 128, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.156401

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCR MARVEL, a National Centre of Competence in Research - Swiss National Science Foundation [182892]
  2. Flanders Research Foundation (FWO)
  3. European Research Council under the European Union [804213-TMCS]
  4. EPSRC [EP/S020527/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the phase diagram of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) in the normal state, considering doping and strain dependence. Our comprehensive calculations reveal the competition and coexistence of three intertwined orders: a fully symmetric phase, flavor-symmetry-breaking states, and an incommensurate Kekule spiral (IKS) order. The IKS order is found to be ubiquitous for noninteger doping as well, consistent with experimental observations of electronic compressibility and Fermi surface structure. This study suggests a unified picture of the phase diagram in terms of IKS order.
We investigate the full doping and strain-dependent phase diagram of the normal state of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene (TBG). Using comprehensive Hartree-Fock calculations, we show that at temperatures where superconductivity is absent the global phase structure can be understood based on the competition and coexistence between three types of intertwined orders: a fully symmetric phase, spatially uniform flavor-symmetry-breaking states, and an incommensurate Kekule spiral (IKS) order. For small strain, the IKS phase, recently proposed as a candidate order at all nonzero integer fillings of the moire unit cell, is found to be ubiquitous for noninteger doping as well. We demonstrate that the corresponding electronic compressibility and Fermi surface structure are consistent with the cascade physics and Landau fans observed experimentally. This suggests a unified picture of the phase diagram of TBG in terms of IKS order.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据