4.8 Article

Improving Short-Term Stability in Optical Lattice Clocks by Quantum Nondemolition Measurement

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 128, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.153201

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union from the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) [17FUN03-USOQS]
  2. European Union
  3. EMPIR
  4. H2020 QuantERA ERA-NET Cofund Q-CLOCKS - MCIN/AEI/FEDER A way to make Europe [PCI2018-092973]
  5. H2020 FET Quantum Technologies Flagship project MACQSIMAL [820393]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science projects OCARINA - MCIN/AEI/FEDER A way to make Europe [PGC2018-097056-B-I00]
  7. Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence [CEX2019-000910-S]
  8. Generalitat de Catalunya: CERCA, AGAUR Grant [2017-SGR-1354]
  9. Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca [001-P-001644]
  10. Fundacio Privada Cellex
  11. Fundacio Mir-Puig

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a multimeasurement estimation protocol for quantum nondemolition measurements in optical lattice clocks. The protocol utilizes correlations between multiple nondestructive measurements to improve clock stability and optimize experimental parameters.
We propose a multimeasurement estimation protocol for quantum nondemolition (QND) measurements in a Rabi clock interferometer. The method is well suited for current state-of-the-art optical lattice clocks with QND measurement capabilities. The protocol exploits the correlations between multiple nondestructive measurements of the initially prepared coherent spin state. A suitable Gaussian estimator for the clock laser detuning is presented, and an analytic expression for the sensitivity of the protocol is derived. We use this analytic expression to optimize the protocol using available experimental parameters, achieving an improvement of 7.9 dB with respect to the standard quantum limit in terms of clock stability. We also discuss the measurement back-action effects of our protocol into the atomic state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据