4.8 Article

Impact of Clustering on the 8Li β Decay and Recoil Form Factors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 128, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.202503

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-1913728]
  2. SURA, Czech Science Foundation [22-14497S]
  3. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000765]
  4. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. National Science Foundation [OAC-1818253]
  7. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1746045]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we constrained recoil corrections in the beta decay of Li-8 by identifying a strong correlation between them and the Li-8 ground state quadrupole moment through large-scale ab initio calculations. These results are crucial for improving the sensitivity of high-precision experiments that investigate weak interaction theory and test physics beyond the standard model.
We place unprecedented constraints on recoil corrections in the beta decay of Li-8, by identifying a strong correlation between them and the Li-8 ground state quadrupole moment in large-scale ab initio calculations. The results are essential for improving the sensitivity of high-precision experiments that probe the weak interaction theory and test physics beyond the standard model. In addition, our calculations predict a 2(+) state of the a + a system that is energetically accessible to beta decay but has not been observed in the experimental Be-8 energy spectrum, and has an important effect on the recoil corrections and beta decay for the A = 8 systems. This state and an associated 0(+) state are notoriously difficult to model due to their cluster structure and collective correlations, but become feasible for calculations in the ab initio symmetry-adapted no-core shell-model framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据