4.6 Article

Maltaricin CPN, a new class IIa bacteriocin produced by Carnobacterium maltaromaticum CPN isolated from mould-ripened cheese

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 1268-1274

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13248

关键词

bacteriocins; food preservation; food safety; lactic acid bacteria; Listeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsThe purpose of this study was to isolate, characterize and determine the structure and the antibacterial activities of a bacteriocin produced by Carnobacterium maltaromaticum CPN, a strain isolated from unpasteurized milk Camembert cheese. Methods and ResultsThis bacteriocin, termed maltaricin CPN, was produced at higher amounts in MRS broth at temperatures between 15 degrees C and 25 degrees C. It was purified to homogeneity from culture supernatant by using a simple method consisting of cation-exchange and reversed-phase chromatographies. Mass spectrometry showed that maltaricin was a 442729Da bacteriocin. Its amino acid sequence was determined by Edman degradation which showed that it had close similarity with bacteriocins of the class IIa. Maltaricin CPN consisted in fact of 44 unmodified amino acids including two cysteine residues at positions 9 and 14 linked by a disulphide bond. The antimicrobial activity of maltaricin CPN covered a range of bacteria, with strong activity against many species of Gram-positive bacteria, especially the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, but no activity against Gram-negative ones. ConclusionsIn the studied conditions, C.maltaromaticum CPN produced a new class IIa bacteriocin with strong anti-Listeria activity. Significance and Impact of the StudyThe study covers the purification and the structural characterization of a new bacteriocin produced by strain C.maltaromaticum CPN isolated from Camembert cheese. Its activity against strains of L.monocytogenes and higher production rates at relatively low temperatures show potential technological applications to improve the safety of refrigerated food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据