4.5 Article

Effect of Zn Substitution on the Structural, Optical Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of BiFeO3 Nanopowders

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssr.202200081

关键词

crystal structure; doped BFO; hydrothermal synthesis; nanostructured materials; optical properties; Raman spectroscopy

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement et la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Laboratoire project [LR99ES17, PRF2019-D4P2]
  3. Tunisio-Marrocain project [20/RD23]
  4. PHC Utique project [21G1408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrothermally synthesized Zn-doped BiFeO3 materials exhibit increased crystal-field modification and enhanced photocatalytic activity, making them promising candidates for various applications.
The multiferroic Zn-doped BiFeO3 materials with nominal formula BiFe1-xZnxO3 (0 <= x <= 0.08) are successfully synthesized using hydrothermal synthesis allowing to obtain powders with an average grain size of 8 nm. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy analysis prove that nanopowders are pure and homogeneous and show an increase of the unit cell volume when the amount of Zn increases attesting of the substitution of Fe site. Using temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy, it is also found that the Neel antiferromagnetic critical temperature is weakly, if any, affected. In contrast, using UV-vis reflectance measurements, clear changes are observed in the features of the optical absorption with modifications of the crystal-field when increasing the Zn amount. The photocatalytic activity of the pure and the most doped samples is evaluated by the degradation of the methylene blue dye under visible light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of the Zn-doped samples is found to be higher than that of BiFeO3. After 3 h of sunlight irradiation, the degradation efficiency increases from 61% to 83% for BiFeO3 and BiFe0.92Zn0.08O3, respectively. The crystal-field modification after Zn substitution is considered as the principal cause of the obvious enhanced photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据