4.5 Article

Characterization of CVD-synthesized graphene films transferred on different substrates using the scanning probe microscopy electrical techniques

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2021.115101

关键词

Graphene; Scanning probe microscopy; Surface potential; Local capacity

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [17-12-01002P, AAAA-A18-118053090045-8]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2021-680]
  3. [AAAA-A19-119012990095-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares the surface potential and local electrostatic properties of graphene films on different dielectric substrates, revealing that the type of substrate, number of layers, and defects will affect the surface potential distribution of graphene.
The use of local electrical characteristics of graphene films prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method on Cu and transferred on different substrates such as glass, SiO2/Si and Al2O3 substrates was discussed. The topography, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) and electrostatic force microscopy (EFM) were compared for graphene on the three different dielectric substrates. The surface potentials of graphene films were investigated using KPFM. It was found that graphene films exhibited nonuniform surface potential distribution depending on the sort of the underlying substrate used, the number of graphene layers and the presence of graphene film defects such as edges, wrinkles etc. The EFM results demonstrated that the local electrostatic properties of graphene film on Al(2)O(3 & nbsp;)substrate differ significantly compared to that on glass and SiO2/Si substrates. The cross-correlation coefficients between topographical image and SCM-and EFM-images were estimated in order to compare these techniques. It was shown that the techniques can bring complementary information for the characterization of graphene films on different substrates relevant for applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据