4.5 Article

Computational studies and experimental fabrication of DSSC device assembly on 2D-layered TiO2 and MoS2@TiO2 nanomaterials

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 633, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2022.413770

关键词

DFT Study; TiO2; MoS2@TiO2; DSSC; Heterostructures; Solar cells

资金

  1. DST-SERB [EEQ/198/2016]
  2. TNSCST-YSF
  3. Policy (TNMultiGen) Govt of India [F.24-51/2014-U]
  4. [MHRD-SPARC-890]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel two-dimensional nanostructure of pure TiO2 and a heterostructure of citric acid and L-cysteine capped on MoS2@TiO2 were synthesized using the hydrothermal method. Experimental and theoretical studies showed that the heterostructure has potential applications in fields such as dye-sensitized solar cells, optoelectronic devices, and energy storage. The L-cysteine capped MoS2@TiO2 heterostructure exhibited better solar cell performance compared to single-phase TiO2.
Herein, we synthesized a novel two-dimensional nanostructure of pure TiO2 and heterostructure of citric acid and L-cysteine capped on MoS2@TiO2 by hydrothermal method. Prepared nanomaterials are characterised by the latest analytical methods and the obtained results are compared with the Density Functional Theory based theoretical simulation results. The experimental and theoretical studies of pure TiO2, MoS2@TiO2 showed that the heterostructure has latent applications in many fields, such as dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) and optoelectronic devices, energy storage and conversion, etc. The optimized structure and lowest excited states of pure TiO2 and MoS2@TiO2 heterostructure should have been obtained by DFT. Especially the newly adopted experimental data of spectral analysis are well aligned with theoretical values. Through our investigation, it is evidenced that L-cysteine capped MoS2@TiO2 heterostructure has better solar cell performance compared to single-phase TiO2. The long lasting DSSC performances were significantly from 2.6 to 3.3%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据