4.6 Article

Occidiofungin is an important component responsible for the antifungal activity of Burkholderia pyrrocinia strain Lyc2

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 607-618

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13036

关键词

antifungal activity; Burkholderia pyrrocinia; multilocus sequence typing; occidiofungin; strain Lyc2

资金

  1. Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System [SDAIT-01-022-09]
  2. Shandong Provincial Innovation Project on Major Agricultural Application Technology of China
  3. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U. S. Department of Agriculture [MIS-401170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsTo identify the taxonomy of tobacco rhizosphere-isolated strain Lyc2 and investigate the mechanisms of the antifungal activities, focusing on antimicrobials gene clusters identification and function analysis. Methods and ResultsMultilocus sequence typing and 16S rRNA analyses indicated that strain Lyc2 belongs to Burkholderia pyrrocinia. Bioassay results indicated strain Lyc2 showed significant antifungal activities against a broad range of plant and animal fungal pathogens and control efficacy on seedling damping off disease of cotton. A 552-kb gene cluster which was homologous to ocf gene clusters in Burkholderia contaminans MS14 was confirmed to be responsible for antifungal activities by random mutagenesis; HPLC was used to verify the production of antifungal compounds. Multiple antibiotic and secondary metabolized biosynthesis gene clusters predicated by antiSMASH revealed the broad spectrum of antimicrobials activities of the strain. ConclusionsOur results revealed the mechanisms of antifungal activities of strain Lyc2 and expand our knowledge about production of occidiofungin in the bacteria Burkholderia. Significance and Impact of the StudyUnderstanding the mechanisms of antifungal activities of strain Lyc2 has contributed to discovery of new antibiotics and expand our knowledge of production of occidiofungin in the bacteria Burkholderia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据