4.5 Article

Investigation of magnetic properties and converse magnetoelectric effect in the composite of doped barium hexaferrite with potassium niobate, 0.5BaFe10Sc2O19-0.5KNbO3 and 0.5BaFe10In2O19-0.5KNbO3

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 633, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2022.413736

关键词

Barium hexaferrite; Potassium niobate; X-ray diffraction; Magnetization; Dielectric; Converse magnetoelectric coupling

资金

  1. UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the magnetic and electric properties of 0.5BFSc2O-0.5KNO and 0.5BFIn2O-0.5KNO composite samples. The results show the presence of both ferrimagnetic and ferroelectric phases in these compounds, with the properties being controlled by electric poling and stress induction. Strong converse magnetoelectric coupling effects are also observed.
This study investigates the magnetic and electric properties of the 0.5BaFe(10)Sc(2)O(19)-0.5KNbO(3) (0.5BFSc2O-0.5KNO) and 0.5BaFe(10)In(2)O(19)-0.5KNbO(3) (0.5BFIn2O-0.5KNO) composite samples. Refined X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies substantiate the presence of both ferrimagnetic (BFSc2O and BFIn2O) and ferroelectric KNbO3 phase with the ratio (0.5:0.5) in both the compounds without any impure phase. By electric poling the samples with an electric field of 2.5 kV/cm, magnetization shows a different behaviour (decreasing in Sc and increasing in doped composite), can be attributed to the electric field induced changes of spin states due to stress induced at the interface of ferrimagnetic (FM)/ferroelectric (FE) regions. Strong converse magnetoelectric coupling (CME) was observed in both the compounds, with a large electric field modulation in magnetism (80%) in the 0.5BFInO-0.5KNO composite. Dielectric studies reveal the presence of ferroelectric (FE-T-c) transition around the magnetic Curie temperature (FM-T-c) of respective composites, further indicates the presence of converse magnetoelectric coupling in both systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据